The hunt for the right leverage

How does a company's choice of capital structure affect its value? Does an overly conservative or overly risky balance sheet hurt valuation? Nordea On Your Mind has analysed the hard data.

Nordea On Your Mind The Hunt For The Right Leverage Cover Image.pdf

In the latest issue of Nordea On Your Mind, “The hunt for the right leverage”, we explore how a company’s choice of capital structure affects its business valuation.

It’s not about proving Nobel Prize winners wrong

Classical economic theory, such as the Modigliani-Miller theorem, suggests capital structure does not matter for a company’s value. It is well known that this relies on theoretical assumptions that do not hold in reality, but we want to go further and analyse hard data to look for evidence that companies with more “extreme” balance sheets are seeing their valuations penalised versus those of their peers. In other words, does an overly conservative or overly risky balance sheet mean that you are valued below your full potential?

Rising leverage not matched by higher valuation multiples

Net debt to EBITDA has been on the rise for listed companies globally for the past 15 years, particularly in the US and Asia, as well as in the energy, utilities and telecoms sectors, fueled by interest rates falling to historical record lows over the period. However, 12-month forward EV/EBITDA multiples remain broadly within their historical ranges, across regions and sectors.

An inefficient balance sheet can give you a valuation penalty

Equity capital is more expensive than debt, and we see in our data for 1,800 global listed companies over 15 years that those with the lowest leverage tend to have a lower valuation than their peers. Those with the highest leverage tend to have a premium valuation, but this premium has decreased over time. When we analyse share price performance, we see that the less leveraged companies have outperformed, as the highly leveraged companies tend to suffer during market shocks and have been unable to catch up from their performance setbacks on those occasions.

What capital structure should I choose to maximise the value of my company?

The simple answer is: avoid the extremes. If you have an ultra-strong balance sheet, you need to be able to justify this to shareholders with factors such as high business risk or “fuel” for very strong growth. Idle cash will likely lower your valuation. High leverage typically boosts your valuation – but only up to the point where there starts to be a perceived risk of financial distress, which is sharply negative for the valuation. Over time, however, our simulation of leverage-based investment strategies shows significant share price underperformance for highly leveraged companies, suggesting that the risk of financial distress posed by a weaker balance sheet may be underestimated by investors.

Views from the proactive pioneers

We have interviewed CEO Lars Dahlgren and CFO Anders Larsson from Swedish Match, which has largely stuck to a clear and transparent financial policy from 2005 and has consistently used share buybacks to avoid accumulating idle cash. In another interview, Kongsberg CFO Gyrid Skalleberg Ingergø describes how a major acquisition became a catalyst for a journey towards an optimal capital structure, which has involved bonds, dividends, share buybacks and a rights issue.

 

Johan Trocmé and Viktor Sonebäck

If you are a corporate client and want to access the full Nordea On Your Mind report, please contact Viktor Sonebäck.

Find out more about the full range of articles from Nordea On Your Mind here.

Sign up for the Open Insights newsletter

TAKE ME TO THE SIGN-UP PAGE
Woman Using Virtual Reality Headset

The information provided within this website is intended for background information only. The views and other information provided herein are the current views of Nordea Bank Abp as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. The information provided within this website is not an exhaustive description of the described product or the risks related to it, and it should not be relied on as such, nor is it a substitute for the judgement of the recipient.

The information provided within this website is not intended to constitute and does not constitute investment advice nor is the information intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The information provided within this website has no regard to the specific investment objectives, the financial situation or particular needs of any particular recipient. Relevant and specific professional advice should always be obtained before making any investment or credit decision. It is important to note that past performance is not indicative of future results.

Nordea Bank Abp is not and does not purport to be an adviser as to legal, taxation, accounting or regulatory matters in any jurisdiction.

The information provided within this website may not be reproduced, distributed or published for any purpose without the prior written consent from Nordea Bank Abp.

Further reading